Join Uttar Pradesh Teacher Eligibility Test News

09:51 – by 4

Join Uttar Pradesh Teacher Eligibility Test News

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - 97/105 Marks Vale Abhyarthee Supreme Court Mein Apnee Niyukti Ka Dava Pesh Karenge -

Posted: 21 Feb 2015 05:41 AM PST

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News  - 97/105 Marks Vale Abhyarthee Supreme Court Mein Apnee Niyukti Ka Dava Pesh Karenge -


Candidates Bade Jor Shor Se Supreme Court Mein Apnaa Daava Pesh karne Kee Tayaree Kare Mein Jute.


See :- >

नमस्कार मित्रों, कल हमारी विधिक टीम द्वारा IA को रीड करके व कुछ करेक्शन के उपरांत अपने AOR श्री अमित पवन जी को उपलब्ध करा दिया गया हैं! जिसे आज या सोमवार तक फाइल कर दिया जायेगा! इसमें हमने अपने समस्त डॉक्यूमेंट लगा दिए हैं व लगभग २००० counselled कैंडिडेट्स को respondent बनाया गया हैं ! इस IA में अपने सम्पूर्ण प्रभावी दस्तावेजों को लगा दिया गया हैं व उत्तर प्रदेश की शैक्षिक दुर्व्यवस्था को दर्शाते हुए प्रदेश के बेरोजगारों से हुयी लूट (लगभग ३५० करोड़) व RTE एक्ट, मूल अधिकार, न्यायालय के आदेशों की अवमानना को दर्शा कर समस्त १०५/९७ को तत्काल नियुक्ति पत्र का सख्त आदेश देने की मांग की गयी हैं! साथ ही साथ हमने अपने IA में यह भी दर्शाया हैं कि इस समय उत्तर प्रदेश में लगभग ५ लाख प्राथमिक शिक्षक के पद रिक्त पड़े हैं और अगले ४ साल में भी शिक्षकों की अत्यधिक कमीं आने वाली हैं जबकि इस समय उत्तर प्रदेश में सिर्फ २ लाख ७२ हजार टेट उत्तीर्ण उपलब्ध हैं! इस प्रकार २.७२ लाख नियुक्तियों का मार्ग भी हमने प्रसस्त कर दिया हैं जिसे कोर्ट संज्ञान में ले कर सर्वप्रथम १०५/९७ को नियुक्ति पत्र दिलाते हुए समस्त २.७२ लाख टेट उत्तीर्ण के नियुक्ति का आदेश भी कर देगी! हमने अपनी IA में इतने महत्वपूर्ण दस्तावेज लगाये हैं जो सरकारी अधिवक्ता को निरुत्तर करते हुए मा० दीपक मिश्र जी के सामने भी गंभीर धर्म संकट उत्पन्न कर देंगे, अब या तो मा० दीपक मिश्र जी अपने आखों के सामने अगले ५ साल तक शिक्षकों के अभाव में नौनिहालों की शिक्षा व RTE एक्ट/ मूल अधिकारों का हनन होता देखते रहे अथवा टेट-२०११ उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थियों के नियुक्ति का आदेश करें क्योकि नेक्स्ट इयर हमारा टेट सर्टिफिकेट भी एक्सपायर हो रहा हैं!
मित्रों हमारी टीम ने समस्त टीम की प्रतिनिधियों, जिलाप्रतिनिधियों इत्यादि की मीटिंग २२ फरवरी को प्रगति मैदान, दिल्ली में रखी हैं जिसमें आप सभी के विचार सादर आमंत्रित हैं!
काव्य शर्मा जी से कहना चाहूँगा कि आप भी हमारा सहयोग करें क्योकि आप अजय ठाकुर की चक्कर में पड़ कर अपने केस से सम्बन्ध न रखने वाले वर्ष 2004 के जनहित याचिका पर कंटेम्प्ट कर आये जो अब रद्दी की टोकरी में जा चूका हैं ! अत: अब आप हमारे IA का सहयोग करें जिससे आपकों और बेरोजगारों को नियुक्ति प्राप्त हो सके!
सुल्तान अहमद जी भी अभी तक कोई IA ड्राफ्ट नही कर पाए हैं अतः उनसे भी अनुरोध हैं कि आप बेरोजगारों के हितों को देखते हुए साथ आये और कुछ समय के लिए अपने जिद्द अवम अहं को त्याग दे!
राहुल पाण्डेय जी से भी हमारा अनुरोध हैं हमारे साथ आकर महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाए!
आप सभी नेतागण भी IA के माध्यम से ही कोर्ट में एंट्री करोगे ! अब जबकि हमारी IA अपने सभी अचूक दस्तावेजों के साथ 25 फरवरी को कोर्ट में प्रभावी भूमिका निभाने के लिए तैयार हैं और लक्ष्य भी सबका एक हैं (अर्थात सर्वप्रथम १०५/९७ तत्पश्चात २.७२ लाख नियुक्ति ) तो फिर सिर्फ नेतागीरी चमकाने के लिए आप सब अलग अलग क्यों भाग रहे हो ! आप सब दिल्ली आओ हमारे दस्तावेज एवम IA देखों फिर हमारा सहयोग करें!
इसके साथ ही में उत्तर प्रदेश के समस्त बेरोजगारों से अनुरोध करूँगा कि मा० न्यायालय द्वारा उपलब्ध कराए गये अवसर का लाभ उठाने और अपने उज्जवल भविष्य के निर्माण के लिए स्वयं आगे आये और हमे अपना सहयोग, समर्थन व आशीर्वाद प्रदान करे! धन्यवाद
__________________________________BY दुर्गेश प्रताप सिंह












 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - ATTESTED DOCUMENT SE JRT + PRT DONO MEIN COUNSELING KARANE KO COURT KA AADESH 19 FEB 2015 -

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 09:00 PM PST

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - ATTESTED DOCUMENT SE JRT + PRT DONO MEIN COUNSELING KARANE KO COURT KA AADESH 19 FEB 2015 -


COUNSELING HO CHUKEE , LEKIN LAGTA HAI KI AB FIR KUCH PETITIONRS KO CHANCE MILNE VAALA HAI

CANDIDATURE PAR KOEE AFFECT NAHIN HOGAA, DONO MEIN NIYUKTI PAR KOEE ASAR NAHIN HOGAA. NIYUKTI COURT KE ANTIM NIRNAY KE ADHEEN RAHEGEE

*****************************************
19 FEB 2015 KO ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT NE YEH AADESH JAAREE KIYAA HAI :-

it is provided that opposite party no.6/District Basic Education Officer, Unnao shall� allow the petitioner to participate in the counseling for the post in question on production of her education testimonials duly attested. Her selection shall abide by the result of the writ petition.
********************************************

JRT SE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT NIKALNE PAR CANDIDATE KO MAJBOORAN AFFIDEVIT DENA PADTAA THAA KI AB VHE JRT BHRTEE PAR DAVA NAHIN KAR SAKENGE, LEKIN COURT NE IS BAARE MEIN RAAHAT DEE HAI, SAATH HEE PETITIONER KO PRIMARY TEACHER KEE COUNSELING MEIN SHAMIL KARNE KAA AADESH DIYAA HAI -
*
For returning the documents, the authorities imposed a condition for submitting affidavit to the effect that the petitioners will not stake claim for appointment in SBS
*

Both JRT + PRT Counseling Order, 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment, 72825  Teacher Recruitment, Allahabad Highcourt,


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 18
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 283 of 2015
Petitioner :- Kumari Kiran Rani
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jyoti Sikka
Hon'ble Anil Kumar,J.
Heard Shri Vinay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party nos.1 to 3 and 5, Ms. Jyoti Sikka, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party nos.4 and 5 and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, for the purpose of interim relief, submits that in an identical matter, this Court has passed an order dated 17.10.2014 in Writ Petition No.6013 (SS) of 2014 which on reproduction reads as under :-
"Heard counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 & 5 to 9, Sri Neeraj Chaurasiya for respondent Nos. 4 & 14, Sri Vindhyawashini Kumar for respondent No. 12, Sri S.K. Yadav for respondent No. 10, Sri Ajay Kumar for respondent No. 13 and Sri Ghaus Beg on behalf of respondent No. 11.
They pray for and are granted four weeks for filing counter affidavit. The petitioners shall have two weeks thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit.
List immediately thereafter.
The petitioners herein have applied for appointment on the post of Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in Senior Basic Schools (for short SBS). They were called for counselling. At the time of counselling, they submitted their original testimonials. In the meantime, the petitioners received intimation for counselling, as trainee teachers in Primary Schools, pursuant to another advertisement, for filling up vacancies of Assistant teachers in Primary Schools, run by the Board. In the said counselling, the condition was that the candidate has to submit his original certificates and testimonials. In order to participate in the said counselling, the petitioners requested the authorities, who have held the selection SBS to return their original testimonials. For returning the documents, the authorities imposed a condition for submitting affidavit to the effect that the petitioners will not stake claim for appointment in SBS. The case of the petitioners is that under compelling circumstances, they have furnished such an undertaking and whereupon, their original testimonials were returned to them. It is the admitted case of the petitioners that, thereafter, they have participated in the counselling for the trainee teacher in Primary Schools, where they had deposited their original testimonials.
In the meantime, a number of writ petitions were filed before this Court wherein, several directions were issued, one of which dated 26th September 2014 in Writ Petition No. 6390 (S/S) of 2014 - Neha Singh Versus State of U.P., mandated the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, to issue direction to Principals, DIET and District Basic Education Officers of the State to permit the candidates to participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on the basis of attested testimonials. The case of the petitioners is that pursuant to the said directions, the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, U.P. had issued a Circular, entitling the candidates to appear in the counselling for trainee teachers on basis of attested testimonials.
The petitioners, after having come to know of such general direction issued by this Court and the Circular issued in this regard by the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, U.P., has approached this Court by way of instant writ petition for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider their candidature for appointment as Assistant teachers in SBS on basis of counselling already held.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 & 4 submitted that the petitioners have already appeared in the counselling for appointment in SBS and have thereafter submitted their affidavit, giving up their claim. Now, they can not resile from the undertaking given by them.
It is not disputed that under the general direction issued by this Court on 26th September 2014 in Writ Petition No. 6390 (S/S) of 2014, the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, U.P. has issued a Circular whereunder, the candidates are now being permitted to participate in the counselling for the post of trainee teachers on basis of certified testimonials. Evidently, the petitioners have submitted their affidavit under compelling circumstances. Prima facie, I am of the opinion that in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners rightly contend that their claim for appointment on the post of Assistant teachers (Maths and Science) in Senior Basic Schools, can not be forfeited. As such, interest of justice would be served in providing that the claim of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Assistant teachers (Maths and Science) in Senior Basic Schools, shall remain alive till further orders of this Court. Such of the petitioners as are willing to appear in the next round of counselling, shall be permitted to appear provisionally, on the basis of attested testimonials, without prejudice to their rights. The selection made, in the meantime, shall be subject to the decision of the writ petition."
Accordingly, he requests that the same benefit may be given to the present petitioner also.
Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the said facts.
Thus, after hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the records as an interim measure, it is provided that opposite party no.6/District Basic Education Officer, Unnao shall� allow the petitioner to participate in the counseling for the post in question on production of her education testimonials duly attested. Her selection shall abide by the result of the writ petition.
Learned State Counsel prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit, rejoinder affidavit, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List thereafter.
Order Date :- 19.2.2015/Mahesh






 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - 3RD COUNSELING TAK SELECT PETITIONER KO NIYUKTI PATRA DENE KAA AADESH

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 08:47 PM PST

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News   - 3RD COUNSELING TAK SELECT PETITIONER KO NIYUKTI PATRA DENE KAA AADESH


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9696 of 2015

Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Lal Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Singh

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
The petitioner belongs to OBC (male) Arts category and he has appeared in the third round of counseling in District Siddharthnagar. The petitioner claimed that his name appeared in the select list prepared after third round of counseling. Despite that appointment letter has not been issued to the petitioner as the candidates having higher marks than that of the petitioners have been allowed to participate in the fourth round of counseling and the entire result has been reshuffled.
Learned Standing counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 6 pray for and are allowed three weeks time to file counter affidavit. One week, thereafter, for filing rejoinder affidavit.
Connect with Writ-A No. 5001 of 2015.
In the meantime, appointment letter be issued to the petitioner by the respective DIET after verification of his eligibility and after ascertaining the fact of appearance in the counseling as per his merit. It goes without saying that the appointment of the petitioner shall be subject matter of the result of this writ petition and Civil Appeal No. 4347/4375 of 2014 (State of U.P. & others versus Shiv Kumar Pathak) pending before the Apex Court.
It is made clear that the candidates to whom appointment letters have already been issued, will not be affected by this interim order.
Order Date :- 18.2.2015
B.K.





 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

BTC COUNSELING MATTER IN ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 08:45 PM PST

BTC COUNSELING MATTER IN ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 3

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 1483 of 2014

Petitioner :- Suman Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thr.Prin.Secy.(Basic Education) Lucknow & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Pathak
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar

Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J.
Heard Sri Sharad Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the B.S.A. and the learned standing counsel for the State.
The petitioner had appeared in the selection process held for B.T.C. Training Course, 2012, but, had made certain incorrect entry in the online form submitted by her.� Instead of 136 marks obtained in High School Examination, she had mentioned 156 marks.� There was a clear stipulation in the guideline etc. that if any discrepancy was found in the marks filled by the candidates and those noticed from the documents, the candidature shall not be considered.
The process of selection has already been completed.
In view of the reasons mentioned in the counter affidavit and as noted hereinabove, I do not find any valid ground for interference in the matter at this stage.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is dismissed.
So far as the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that grace marks awarded to the petitioner in the high school� were not taken into consideration at the time of counseling is concerned,� it is provided that this plea shall be open in the future counseling as per Rules as and when occasion arises.
Order Date :- 18.2.2015
NLY

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News 3RD COUNSELUNG TAK SELECT LOGO(SIRF YACHEE) KO NIYUKTI PATR JAAREE KARNE KA DIYA COURT NE AADESH -

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 08:38 PM PST

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News  3RD COUNSELUNG TAK SELECT LOGO(SIRF YACHEE) KO NIYUKTI PATR JAAREE KARNE KA DIYA COURT NE AADESH -


COURT NE NIYUKTI PAA CHUKE LOGO PAR IS AADESH KA KOEE PRBHAV NA HONE KA AADESH BHEE DIYA HAI -
It is made clear that the candidates to whom appointment letter have already been issued, will not be affected by this interim order.


3RD COUNSELING TAK SELECT LOGO KAA AADESH SIRF PETITIONER / YACHEEE KE LIYE AAYAA HAI.
LEKIN AISE AADESH KI COPY LENE KE LIYE TAMMAAM LOG WRIT FILE KARNE JAA RAHE HAIN, PEHLE VE SOCH RAHE THE KEE AADESH SAB KE LIYE HAI


SEE COURT ORDER :-

Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5001 of 2015
Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Upadhayay And 29 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhisekh Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
The petitioners have appeared in the first, second and third round of counseling held for appointment to the post of Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic Schools run by Basic Shikha Parishad, against 72,825 vacancies advertised in the State of U.P. vide advertisement dated 30.11.2011. The petitioners are waiting for their appointment letters. However, it appears that on account of an interim order passed by the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 4347-4375 of 2015 (State of U.P. & Others Versus Shiv Kumar Pathak), fourth round of counseling was held from 9.1.2015 to 14.1.2015. The candidates who have been left out in the first, second and third round of counseling and have obtained 70% marks in general category and 65% marks in reserved category, were allowed to appear in the fourth round of counseling.
Submission of the petitioners is that the candidates who have obtained higher marks than that of the petitioners had appeared in the fourth round of counseling. In the meeting held in the office of the Director, U.P. Technical Education State Council of Educational Research and Training, U.P., Lucknow with the Principals of various DIETs and the District Basic Education Officers of different districts, it was resolved on 6.1.2015 and 7.1.2015 that the candidates who had appeared in the first, second and third round of counseling and whose names appear in the select list on the basis of those counseling, will be issued appointment letter with effect from 19.1.2015. It was also resolved that the fourth round of counseling will be held against the vacant seats from amongst the candidates having requisite percentage i.e. (70%� general category and 65% reserved category). They will be allowed to participate in the fourth round of counseling in the districts where they had applied, irrespective of the fact as to whether they had appeared in the first, second and third round of counseling. It is further observed that those candidates who had appeared in first, second and third round of counseling in certain districts, will also be allowed to appear in the fourth round of counseling in districts in which they had applied but could not appear in the earlier� three counselings for one or other reason. The process will be started on the basis of the select list prepared after last and final round of counseling wherein it was held from 9.1.2015 to 14.1.2015 to issue appointment letters from 19.1.2015 onwards. The petitioners submit that they had appeared in the first, second and third round of counseling, however, pursuant to the fourth counseling, appointment letters are not being issued to them on the ground that they are having lesser marks than the candidates who had appeared in the fourth round of counseling, though the petitioners are having requisite 70% and 65% marks as per the directions of the Apex Court dated 17.12.2014 in Civil Appeal No. 4347/4375 of 2014.
Sri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4 submits that as per the instructions dated 3.2.2015, the appointment letter cannot be issued to the candidates who are having lesser marks than the candidates appeared in the fourth round of counseling, in view of the directions of the Apex Court wherein the candidates having 70% and 65% marks have been allowed to participate in the fourth round of counseling as they have been wrongly left out.
Written instructions dated 3.2.2015 received by the Chief Standing Counsel, High Court, Allahabad supplied by Sri A.K. Yadav, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 4 are taken on record.
A perusal of the communication dated 3.2.2015 indicates that respondent no. 2, the Director, State Council of Educational Research and Training, U.P., Lucknow is of the opinion that no rights have accrued to those candidates for appointment who had appeared in the first, second and third counseling as fourth round of counseling was held pursuant to the direction of the Apex Court. The said assertion of respondent no. 2 appears to be incorrect.
In view of the position that the petitioners have appeared in the first, second and third counseling and possess 70% in general category and 65% in reserved category, the petitioners have a prima facie right to be appointed against the post of Assistant Teacher in the districts in which they have applied and appeared in counseling as per their merit. A case for grant of interim mandamus is made out by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned Standing counsel and Sri A.K. Yadav, learnel Counsel for respondent no. 4 pray for and are allowed three weeks time to file counter affidavit.
One week, thereafter, for filing rejoinder affidavit.
List this matter on 13.3.2015.
In the meantime, appointment letter be issued to the petitioner by the respective DIETs after verification of their eligibility and after ascertaining the fact of appearance in the counseling as per their merit.. It goes without saying that the appointment of the petitioners shall be subject matter of the result of this writ petition� and Civil Appeal No. 4347/4375 of 2014 (State of U.P. & others versus Shiv Kumar Pathak) pending before the Apex Court..
It is made clear that the candidates to whom appointment letter have already been issued, will not be affected by this interim order. 
Order Date :- 10.2.2015/B.K.

SEE ORDER ON OFFICIAL WEBSITE : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3877709


 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

D ED QUALIFICATION ACCEPTANCE FOR 15000 BTC TEACHER IN ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 08:10 PM PST

D ED QUALIFICATION ACCEPTANCE FOR 15000 BTC TEACHER IN ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT


15000 BTC PRT Recruitment, BTC

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10259 of 2015

Petitioner :- Priyanka
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Chandra Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Yadav

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner made a mention in the morning� that the matter is urgent as the last date of submission of� online application form is 20.2.2015, hence� the� record was� called from the office of the� Stamp� Reporter.�
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner possessed the qualification of Diploma in Education i.e. D.Ed.� and claims to be eligible for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in the primary school. She is an applicant against the advertisements dated 12.12.2014 and 15.12.2014. The contention of the petitioner is that qualification possessed by her is the prescribed� qualification by the� NCTE.
By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has sought for� a direction to the respondents to consider the selection and appointment of the petitioner pursuant to the notification dated 9.12.2014 and advertisement dated 26.12.2014� issued for the selection and appointment� against 15,000 posts of� Assistant� Teachers.
Similar controversy came up before Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal Defective No. 130 of 2014 Harsh Kumar & another vs. State f U.P. and four others connected with another Special Appeal No. 131 of 2014 Devendra Narayan Pandey and 11 others. It was observed that qualifications which have been prescribed by the NCTE in notification dated 29.7.2011 include two years Diploma in Education (Special Education) i.e. D.Ed. Once the qualifications have been prescribed by the NCTE, these would necessarily be binding and it is not open for the State Government to exclude (from the zone of eligibility). Consequently, Diploma in Education(Special Education) was held to be a qualification which is recognized for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher for teaching class 1 to 5. A mandamus be issued directing the State Government to permit the appellants therein and such other persons who claim to be holding such qualification which are within the purview of the notification issued by NCTE on 23.8.2010 as amended on 29.7.2011, to apply for the post of Assistant Teacher for teaching class 1 to 5 which was subject matter of advertisement in question.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Special Leave Petition filed in the Apex Court against judgment of this Court dated 5.2.2014 in Special Appeal Defective Nos. 130 of 2014 and 131 of 2014 was dismissed on 13.1.2015. Contention is that the petitioner possesses eligibility qualification as prescribed by NCTE in notification dated 23.8.2010 as amended on 29.7.2011 and hence the case is covered by the judgment of this Court in Harsh Kumar(supra).
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 Prays for and is� allowed three weeks' time to file counter affidavit. One week thereafter for filing rejoinder affidavit.
List after four weeks.
In view thereof, a mandamus is issued to the respondents to accept the application form of the petitioner who claims to be holding the eligibility qualification as per notification issued on 23.8.2010 as amended on 29.7.2011 for the post of Assistant Teacher in the primary school(class 1 to 5) as against advertisement dated 12.12.2014/13.12.2014 i.e. advertisement in question.
Order Date :- 19.2.2015
P.P.

Anudeshak Bhrtee Incomplete Counseling Matter in Allahabad Highcourt

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 08:06 PM PST

 Anudeshak Bhrtee Incomplete Counseling Matter in Allahabad Highcourt- Aglee Date 12 March 2015

*************
Blog Vichaar : Anudeshak Urf Ansh Kalik Bhrtee Kee Avadhee Nikal Jayegee , Lekin Court Mein Maamla Chaltaa Rahegaa Tab kya hogaa.
FIR USKE BAAD NOKRI LAGEGEEE KYAA ?

NYAY MEIN MILEE DEREE, AUR USKE BAAD KYA MILEGAA. YAHEE SAB SE DUKH HOTAA HAI.

72825 SHIKSHAK BHRTEE KO 3 SAAL SE JYADA HO GAYE, TAMAAM KHAMIYAN HUEE AUR HOTEE RAHEE. DOSHEE LOGO PAR KUCH HUA KYA.

ABHYARTHEE AB TAK POORN ROOP SE VETAN PAA RAHE HOTE, SUKH CHEN KEE JINDGEE BASAR KAR RAHE HOTE.

72825  YA LAKHON TEACHER KEE COUNSELING MAATRA 7 DIN KE ANDAR SAMBHAV HAI
LEKIN INCOMPETENT SYSTEM SE SAB LAACHAAR HAIN.
JAB DESH MEIN LAKHON/KARDON VOTING KI COUNTING CHAND GHANTO MEIN HO SAKTEE HAI TO, 72825 KI BHRTEE KYUN NAHIN.

 JAB TAK HINDUSTAN KI COURT KHUD JANLOKPAL AADI KE DAYRE MEIN NAHIN AAYENGEE, TAB TAK J

COURT KI JAVABDEHEE / SAMAY SEEMA KE ANDAR NYAY AADI KE LIYE HEE MAJBOOT JANLOK PAL KEE MAANG THEE.

 HAR AADMI KE OOPAR EK SYSTEM HONA CHAHIYE, AUR USKA LINK POOREE TARH SE DEMOCRACY SE JUDA HONAA CHAHAIYE
********************


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9275 of 2015

Petitioner :- Srikrishna
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amit Shukla

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking mandamus commanding respondent no. 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of� Instructor 'Anshkalik Anudeshak' pursuant to the advertisement dated 31.1.2013. It appears that the petitioner has participated under the category of dependents of freedom fighter and it is stated that the petitioner has secured place in the select list. In the counseling held on 8.5.2013, the cut-off for the dependent of freedom fighters category was 51.6 and the candidates were allowed to join on 11.1.2014. Computing 2% post for dependent of freedom fighters, out of total 275 posts, 5 posts were to be filled out of the said category. However, only two candidates were selected and three posts have been kept vacant. The petitioner was waiting for counseling.
The prayer is to conduct the counseling for the dependents of freedom fighter dependent quota.
Sri Amit Shukla, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 2 and 3 and learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1.
Sri Amit Shukla, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 submits that as on date the counseling has not been done, however, the question is for pending consideration before respondent no. 3.
A perusal of the information sought by the petitioner under Right to Information Act dated 11.9.2014 indicates that three posts in the said category are vacant.
In view thereof, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 is hereby directed to seek instructions as to what steps have been taken to fill up� the vacant advertised post of the freedom fighters category, out of the total 275 advertised post of 'Anshkalik Anudeshak', in Art category.
Put up this matter on 12.3.2015 as fresh.
Order Date :- 16.2.2015
B.K.

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - Junior Bhrtee Mein Sansodhan Kar Cutoff Nikale Jane se Niyukti se Vanchit Ki Yachika, Aglee Date 25 Feb 2015

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 07:30 PM PST

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News -  Junior Bhrtee Mein Sansodhan Kar Cutoff Nikale Jane se Niyukti se Vanchit Ki Yachika, Aglee Date 25 Feb 2015


Court Ne Maamle Ko Gambheerta Se Liyaaa, Aur Candidate ke Hiton Ke Khilaaf Batayaa.

Maamla thaa ki Cut-off Mein Sansodhan Hua, Aur Candidate Ko Pata Na Lag Paane Ki Vajhe Se Usne Counseling Nahin Karayee, Aur Vhe Niyukti Paane Se Vanchit Reh Gayaa.
Ab Usne Court Ka Sahara Liyaa Hai, Court Ne Maamle Ko Gambheer Bataya Hai, Aur Aglee Sunvayee Kee Tareekh 25 Feb 2015 Tay Kee Hai

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9217 of 2015

Petitioner :- Pushpendra Kumar Soni
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Namit Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manu Singh

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Petitioner belongs to O.B.C. category and has applied for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Science in Junior High School. The submission is that in the advertisement dated 3.1.2015 the date of counseling for Maths was 7.1.2015 and Science was 8.1.2015. The cut of marks as shown in the advertisement dated 3.1.2015 for O.B.C. category was 66.25. However, a corrigendum dated 6.1.2015 was published in the newspaper dated 8.1.2015 indicating therein cut off marks for O.B.C. Science category was 63.82.The date of counseling in science was changed to 7.1.2015. The contention is that the petitioner possessed 64.51 marks in Science and as per corrigendum dated 8.1.2015 the petitioner was duly qualified for counseling, however, due to the earlier advertisement wherein cut off marks were higher and the corrigendum having been published, only one day prior to the date fixed for counseling, the petitioner could not participate in the counseling. Serious prejudice has been caused to the petitioner.
Shri Manu Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 prays for and is allowed a week time to seek instructions.
Put up this matter as fresh on 25.2.2015.
Order Date :- 16.2.2015
Atul kr. sri.


UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRINews
UPTET 29334 Latest News In Hindi | Join UPTET
Uptet | Uptet news |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling |

29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment, Upper Primary Teacher Recruitment UP , 29334 junior teacher vacancy in up latest news, , UPTET,  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS ,  SARKARI NAUKRI


CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET/  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - Junior Bhrtee Mein Sansodhan Kar Cutoff Nikale Jane se Niyukti se Vanchit Ki Yachika, Aglee Date 25 Feb 2015

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 07:26 PM PST

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News -  Junior Bhrtee Mein Sansodhan Kar Cutoff Nikale Jane se Niyukti se Vanchit Ki Yachika, Aglee Date 25 Feb 2015

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9217 of 2015

Petitioner :- Pushpendra Kumar Soni
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Namit Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manu Singh

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Petitioner belongs to O.B.C. category and has applied for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Science in Junior High School. The submission is that in the advertisement dated 3.1.2015 the date of counseling for Maths was 7.1.2015 and Science was 8.1.2015. The cut of marks as shown in the advertisement dated 3.1.2015 for O.B.C. category was 66.25. However, a corrigendum dated 6.1.2015 was published in the newspaper dated 8.1.2015 indicating therein cut off marks for O.B.C. Science category was 63.82.The date of counseling in science was changed to 7.1.2015. The contention is that the petitioner possessed 64.51 marks in Science and as per corrigendum dated 8.1.2015 the petitioner was duly qualified for counseling, however, due to the earlier advertisement wherein cut off marks were higher and the corrigendum having been published, only one day prior to the date fixed for counseling, the petitioner could not participate in the counseling. Serious prejudice has been caused to the petitioner.
Shri Manu Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 prays for and is allowed a week time to seek instructions.
Put up this matter as fresh on 25.2.2015.
Order Date :- 16.2.2015
Atul kr. sri.


UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRINews
UPTET 29334 Latest News In Hindi | Join UPTET
Uptet | Uptet news |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling |

29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment, Upper Primary Teacher Recruitment UP , 29334 junior teacher vacancy in up latest news, , UPTET,  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS ,  SARKARI NAUKRI


CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET/  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

BTC SARKARI NAUKRI News NCTE RECOGNITION B ED DEGREE ISSUE -

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 07:22 PM PST

BTC SARKARI NAUKRI News  NCTE RECOGNITION B ED DEGREE ISSUE -

 Order Date :- 11.2.2015

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. - 59

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33013 of 2009

Petitioner :- Anil Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Adhar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.A. Akhtar
with
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 29302 of 2009

Petitioner :- Smt. Umarani
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Nishant Mehrotra,Pranjal Mehrotra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anurag Khanna
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 32939 of 2009

Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Sharma
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- P.S. Pundir
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33954 of 2009

Petitioner :- Kanchan Sharma
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Shula
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35365 of 2009

Petitioner :- Suman Gupta
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33613 of 2009

Petitioner :- Akshayber Nath Tiwari
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33788 of 2009

Petitioner :- Suresh Mishra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Prakash Pathak, Manoj Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34508 of 2009

Petitioner :- Smt. Malti & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34514 of 2009

Petitioner :- Geeta Joshi
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34527 of 2009

Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar, B.D. Mishra, Rakesh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar, Rajeshwar Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35623 of 2009

Petitioner :- Km. Seema
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Smt. Sandhya Sachan
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35926 of 2009

Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Sharma
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- P.S. Pundir
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 38068 of 2009

Petitioner :- Smt. Aneeta Sudhakar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Agrahari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhatar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 37359 of 2009

Petitioner :- Surendra Pal Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- K.N. Raha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., S.P.Mishra
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39529 of 2009

Petitioner :- Dal Chandra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhakar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39573 of 2009

Petitioner :- Smt. Naaz Kamali
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- A. Raza
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39282 of 2009

Petitioner :- Smt. Malay Kumari
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39648 of 2009

Petitioner :- Chandra Pal
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Bahadur
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Neeraj Tiwari, R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39862 of 2009

Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Singh & Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39864 of 2009

Petitioner :- Prem Lata Narvariya
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 41182 of 2009
Petitioner :- Smt. Alka Saxsena
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhatar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 42029 of 2009

Petitioner :- Bavita Mishra & Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 42205 of 2009

Petitioner :- Pushpa
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Kumar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33329 of 2009

Petitioner :- Km. Chanchal Raheja
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranajit Shome, P.B. Singh, V.K. Rathi
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neeraj Tiwari, R.A. Akhatar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43941 of 2009

Petitioner :- Smt. Manju Rani
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar, S.K. Singh /S.C./ 2009/ 154
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 44808 of 2009

Petitioner :- Smt. Sunita
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Miss Archna Hans
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Anil Tiwari, R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 45102 of 2009

Petitioner :- Archana Rajpoot
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ken Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 46637 of 2009
Petitioner :- Kumari Reeta Rawat
Respondent :- Dir. State Council For Edu. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P.N. Giri
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 46825 of 2009

Petitioner :- Smt. Babita Gupta
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Misra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48203 of 2009

Petitioner :- Seema Gupta
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar, Sanjay Kr. Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49251 of 2009

Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Mishra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Azad Rai, Lal Chandra Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49658 of 2009

Petitioner :- Abha Srivastava
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- B.K. Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50007 of 2009

Petitioner :- Dr. Neelam Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.D. Gupta, Bajarang Bahadur Singh, Mohan Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Yashwant Varma, J.
Learned counsel for the parties have pointed out that Writ-A No. 37599 of 2009, Writ-A No. 39637 of 2009, Writ-A No. 48050 of 2009, Writ-A No. 36587 of 2009 and Writ-A No. 33943 of 2009 raise different issues and are to be decided separately from this batch of petitions.
Accordingly, these five writ petition shall stand detached from this batch of petitions.
This batch of writ petitions had come before this Court wherein, the petitioners sought the issuance of a writ commanding the respondents to permit them to join as Assistant Teachers in the Basic Primary Schools in the Special B.T.C., 2008. The petitioners were compelled to approach this Court primarily on account of conditions imposed in the advertisement. These conditions non suited candidates who had obtained the B.Ed. Degree prior to enforcement of the NCTE Act, 2003 and/or candidates who had obtained degrees from institutions whose applications for recognition were pending at the relevant time. The learned counsel for the parties have accordingly classified the matter before this Court as falling under the following two heads:
(A) B.Ed. degree obtained from Universities and affiliated colleges thereof before the commencement of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, which have been granted recognition after the Act came into force;
(B) B.Ed. degree obtained from Universities during the pendency of applications for recognition after which they have been recognized.
During the course of the said disputes being raised for B.T.C., 2007, this Court had been petitioned by various candidates assailing their rejection on the aforementioned grounds. Ultimately a Full Bench of this Court by its judgment was pleased to quash the offending conditions imposed in the Advertisement for Special B.T.C. Training Course, 2007. The judgment rendered by the Full Bench of our Court was taken in appeal by the State and was affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court vide its judgment and order dated 29th October, 2010. It would be apposite here to extract the relevant paragraphs of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court:-
"[15] The real question that falls for our consideration is whether only B.Ed. Candidates who have obtained this degree after grant of recognition by NCTE or those candidates who have obtained their degree when the application of the institution for recognition was pending or such of those candidates who have obtained B.Ed. Degree prior to commencement of the Act, on 1st July, 1995 are also eligible to join the BTC course. On an analysis of the material available on record and the submissions, the following are the various possible distinctions identified during the course of several levels of litigations concerning the issue:
(I) Degrees obtained from recognised institutions which have initiated such courses after the commencement of NCTE Act;
(II) Degrees obtained from institutions during the pendency of applications seeking recognition which ultimately did not receive the recognition;
(III) Degrees obtained from institutions during the pendency of applications after which they have been recognized;
(IV) Degrees obtained from Universities and affiliated colleges before the commencement of NCTE Act which have been granted recognition after the Act coming into force; and
(V) Degrees obtained from Universities and affiliated colleges before the commencement of the Act which have not been granted recognition.
[18] A fair reading and analysis of the scheme of the Act with respect to recognition of the institution imparting course or training in teacher education is an essential prelude to the core questions involved. On a plain reading of the provisions it is evident that on and from the date of enforcement of the Act, every institution offering or intending to offer the course or training in teacher education, was required to make application to the Regional Committee in such from and manner as may be determined by the regulations as provided in Section 14 of the Act. The proviso to Section 14(1) states that an institution offering a course or training in teacher education immediately before the appointed day, shall be entitled to continue such course or training for a period and until disposal of the application by the Regional Committee. What happens in case of existing institution makes application seeking recognition within the prescribed time but no decision is taken by the Council within the period of six months? Does it mean that the institution can impart training only for a period of six months and thereafter close the institution? Section 14(5) states that every institution, in respect of which recognition has been refused shall discontinue the course or training in teacher education from the end of the academic session next following the date of receipt of the order refusing recognition passed under clause (b) of sub-section (3).
[21] Prior to the enactment of NCTE Act, the degrees such as B.Ed. Course for teacher education were being awarded by the Universities or by the recognized institutions by the University Grants Commission or by such bodies as authorized by the University Grants Commission as the case may be were of sub-standard in anture in comparison to those degrees granted by the recognized institutions after the NCTE Act came into force. Such a view may amount to undermining the importance of the university education and the role played by the Universities in promoting the educations and educational standards. Each of the Universities have their own systems and mechanism to grant affiliation to the institutions offering courses at the college/University level and grant of affiliation is never considered to be a matter of course. Universities always ensure maintenance of standards and degrees awarded only after successfully completing the prescribed syllabi and the examinations conducted by the Universities. The NCTE Act in no manner makes any distinction between the degrees granted by the Universities or authorized bodies recognized by the University Grants Commission prior to the enactment of the Act and the degrees granted by the recognized institutions after the Act has come into force. NCTE Act provides for the recognition of the institution offering course or training in teacher education and does not speak about recognition of the degrees granted by the institution prior to the Act coming into force. Thus, degrees granted by the institutions already in existence offering a course or training in teacher education shall be deemed to be at par with the degrees or certificates granted by the recognized institutions after the commencement of the Act provided those institutions in existence offering the course also received recognition under the Act.
[22] In our considered view the State Government cannot make any distinction between the degrees obtained from the existing institutions prior to the Act coming into force but received recognition after the comencement of the Act and the degrees obtained from the recognized institutions after the Act coming into force. It is not shown how such a classification is based on an intelligible differentia and on a rational consideration and further how it bears a nexus to the purpose and object thereof. The impugned action of the State results in the classification or division of members of a homogeneous group and subjecting them to differentia treatment without any rhyme or reason."

For the present B.T.C. Training Course, 2008 similar offending conditions stood incorporated in the Advertisement in question. It is this advertisement which has led to the present batch of writ petitions being preferred before this Court.

The parties have categorised these batch of writ petitions under the following heads:

(A)
B.Ed. degree obtained from Universities and affiliated colleges thereof before the commencement of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, which have been granted recognition after the Act came into force.
(B)
B.Ed. degree obtained from Universities during the pendency of applications for recognition after which they have been recognized.
WRIA- 29302/2009(SMT. UMARANI Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS)
WRITA 33013/2009(ANIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 33954/2009 (KANCHAN SHARMA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 32939/2009 (PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 33613/2009 (AKSHAYBER NATH TIWARI Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 35365/2009 (SUMAN GUPTA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 33788/2009 (SURESH MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS)
WRIA- 34508/2009 (SMT. MALTI & OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 34514/2009 (GEETA JOSHI Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 34527/2009 (ARVIND KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 35623/2009 (KM. SEEMA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 35926/2009 (PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)

WRIA- 37359/2009 (SURENDRA PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS)

WRIA- 39529/2009 (DAL CHANDRA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)

WRIA- 39573/2009 (SMT. NAAZ KAMALI Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)

WRIA- 39282/2009 (SMT. MALAY KUMARI Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)

WRIA- 39648/2009 (CHANDRA PAL Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 39862/2009 (PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS) -Petitioner No. 1.
WRIA- 39862/2009 (PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS) Petitioner No. 2

WRIA- 39864/2009 (PREM LATA NARVARIYA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)

WRIA- 41182/2009 (SMT. ALKA SAXSENA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 42029/2009 (BAVITA MISHRA & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS) Petitioner No. 2
WRIA- 42029/2009 (BAVITA MISHRA & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS) Petitioner No. 1.
WRIA- 33329/2009 (KM. CHANCHAL RAHEJA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 42205/2009 (PUSHPA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 46825/2009 (SMT. BABITA GUPTA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 43941/2009 (SMT. MANJU RANI Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 48203/2009 (SEEMA GUPTA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 44808/2009 (SMT. SUNITA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 49658/2009 (ABHA SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 45102/2009 (ARCHANA RAJPOOT Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 50007/2009 (DR. NEELAM SINGH Vs.STATE OFU.P. & OTHERS)
WRIA- 46637/2009 (KUMARI REETA RAWAT Vs. DIR. STATE COUNCIL FOR EDU & OTHERS)

WRIA- 49251/2009 (SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS)

Since in the opinion of this Court, the issues stand already resolved by the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court as affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in appeal, all these writ petitions are liable to be allowed on the same terms and in accordance with the law laid down and referred to above. The respondents are directed to consider and scrutinize the claim of all the petitioners in these writ petitions in terms of the directions and the law laid down by this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India referred to hereinabove. Consequential orders would follow and abide by the above exercise.
The writ petitions stand allowed in terms aforesaid.
Order Date :- 11.2.2015
Arun K. Singh
(Yashwant Varma, J.)


 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

SHIKSHA MITRA SARKARI NAUKRI News -

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 06:54 PM PST

SHIKSHA MITRA SARKARI NAUKRI News   -





 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - आज लगा दी जाएगी तीसरे चरण की सूची

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 06:51 PM PST

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News   -

आज लगा दी जाएगी तीसरे चरण की सूची
•एससीईआरटी के जारी निर्देश के बाद डायट ने शुरू की तैयारियां

Badaun mein the Kul - 1600 Post , Jismen se 1076 Padon Par Niyukti Patr Diye Jaa Chuke Hain


बदायूं। जिले में चल रही प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक भर्ती में बचे रिक्त पदों के सापेक्ष तीसरे चरण की मेरिट बनाने की तैयारियां शुरू कर दी गई हैं। स्टेट काउंसिल ऑफ एजुकेशन रिसोर्स एंड ट्रेनिंग (एससीईआरटी) की ओर से जारी आदेश के बाद डायट ने तैयारियां शुरू कर दी हैं। शनिवार को सूची अनुमोदन के लिए लगा दी जाएगी।
बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग में प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक भर्ती प्रक्रिया चल रही है। 20 जनवरी को पहले और छह फरवरी को दूसरे चरण में सभी पदों के सापेक्ष करीब 1,076 चयनित अभ्यर्थियों को नियुक्ति पत्र दिए जा चुके हैं। इसके बाद बचे हुए पदों पर तीसरे चरण की शुरूआत की जानी थी। इसके लिए डायट संस्थान एससीईआरटी के आदेश का इंतजार में था। जो अब आ चुका है। एससीईआरटी के जारी निर्देश के मुताबिक जिले में रिक्त पदों के सापेक्ष तैयारियों के लिए कहा गया है। डायट प्रवक्ता नवेद खां ने बताया कि एससीईआरटी की ओर से निर्देश आए हैं। लिहाजा तैयारी कराई जा रही हैं। अधिकांशत: पूरी भी कर ली गई हैं। बताया कि सब ठीक रहा तो शनिवार को जिला प्रशासन को अनुमोदन के लिए फाइल लगा दी जाएगी। बता दें कि अभी तक दो चरण हो चुके हैं। इसके बाद मेरिट जारी कर नियुक्ति पा बांटे जाएंगे। बीएसए कृपाशंकर वर्मा ने कहा कि उनकी तैयारी पूरी है। डायट की ओर से अनुमोदित सूची मिलने के बाद भी कार्रवाई बढ़ाई जाएगी।
प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक भर्ती प्रक्रिया





 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News 3rd Round Cutoff Released -

Posted: 20 Feb 2015 06:07 PM PST

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News  3rd Round Cutoff Released  -

See Local News Papers / DIET &BSA offices.

Aaj Sham Tak Sabhee DIETs aur BSA Office Mein 3rd Round Ki List Chaspa Ho Jayegeee


BULAND SEHAR , SAHARANPUR, SHAMLI , MUJAFFARNAGAR, ETAH , Sultanpur, Jhansi etc ki Cut Off Aa Chukee Hai










 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

4 comments:

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)